Posted by
Ikester on Wednesday, April 02, 2008 5:06:10 PM
I wonder how many pro-evolutionists have ever even read Origin of Species? I have been working through it and it is quite amazing to find so much doubt coming from Charlie.
I am reading from Great Books of the Western World, from Britanica, and book 49 is Origin of Species. On page 80, I find the following quote. (emphasis added to quotes for impact)
"But, as by this theory innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?"
He refers the reader to a future chapter where he rambles in trying to explain away the transitional forms.
The simple answer is that they never existed in the first place. The theory runs into itself when it declares that the Horseshoe Crab and Crocodiles never changed from the beginning. How can this be if everything came from a common origin? The reasoning is unreasonable!
One of Darwin's arguments, on page 84, deals with certain traits being passed down to future forms. The Angler fish, the Flying fish, Sturgeon, Gar fish seem to be so radically different that again the theory runs into itself. If the flying fish remained, as it does today, then that characteristic would have been passed down to all its offspring. Can you imagine a flying Sturgeon?
On page 85, He admits, "To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus of different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely admit, absurd in the highest degree."
He goes on further by trying to look at characteristics of creatures, such as the webbed feet of ducks and geese, and recognize that they were formed for swimming. The point here is that they were designed for swimming, they did not evolve webbed feet, God made them this way. He tries to show that webbed feet would indicate that these creatures would spend vast amounts of time in the water, yet these birds spend most of their lives on land.
The huge issue for evolution today is the absolute complexity of everything we see. The trilobite was said to be the simplest form of life and yet today's research shows that its eyes were more complex than the human eye. Can we find a simple creature to prove this hypothesis? NO!
Under 'Modes of Transition,' on page 87, Darwin reveals honest doubts about his theory. We have to remember that he did his research in the1880's and had to rely on very backward methods of research. If he could have lived today, he may have been a staunch creationist. Note the following quote.
"If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down."
Thank you Charlie for your honesty. I wish that today's evolutionists would do the same. His doubt has been answered millions of times in modern research. The complexity of just one cell has been demonstrated to blow evolution out of the water completely. Each cell, we now know, has trillions of parts, rather than just the basic building blocks of yesteryear.
From outer space to inner space, we find design, complexity and profound wonder at what we see. It is said that 95% of astronomers believe that there is a God because of the order and complexity of the universe. How could a medical doctor study the anatomy and physiology of a human body and not see the ultimate design of every system contained in it? Heart, lungs, nervous system, the brain, spinal cord, muscle and bone formation are just a few of the complex structures in man and animals. One would have to absolutely turn away from the evidence in order to hold on to evolution, and they do!
Evolution is on its last leg and I have previously predicted its collapse in the near future. Those who still hold to this failed theory will be scorned as the Flat Earth Society is today. I also predict that the NEXT theory that will be put forth by atheistic scientists, is that life was brought here by space aliens. Just one question remains, who made the space aliens and so far we have not found even one to exist. One actual theory put forth by evolutionary scientists is that a germ came to earth on a meteorite and when it hit the earth the germ popped off and began to replicate to form life on earth. NOW, how could a germ live through the intense heat of the trip through space and entry into earth's atmosphere, and who made the germ and the meteorite?
Well, now is the time for all logical thinkers to put the nix on evolutionary theory. The next step is to force it out of our public school class rooms. Students are there to learn truth, not lies.
Ikester