The new movie 2012 focuses on the destruction of Christianity's holy sites around the world but shows the cowardice of the director by avoiding Islam's holy sites. But they really missed the real target of 2012. It should focus on the White House and congress since the real story will be the removal of the liberals from office. Tuesday's election was merely a first tremor of the coming earthquake. Americans are hard working and intelligent people and they are sick to death of the takeover of our government by Socialist radicals. These are the same people who protested the Vietnam War and got stoned at Woodstock. They are now in office and I for one am ready to send them back to Woodstock, if they will have them. Hillary Clinton wanted taxpayers to sponsor a renewal of Woodstock during her run for president. Her bid failed but maybe she could get the Saudi government to sponsor it as they did her husband's library.

Axelrod, in a recent interview, dodged the real issue of the recent election by focusing on the 23rd district of New York senate seat by saying that this was a referendum on the republicans. Did he miss the drastic turnovers in New Jersey and Virginia plus the vote in Maine to refuse gay marriage? There were many other victories around the nation as well that should send a chill up the leg of Obama owned reporters and others.

New York was less than 4,000 votes difference and who knows whether ACORN was not in on this one to steal these votes. Politics is a dirty game and one which I would not want to be a part of personally.

"I was a young man with unformed ideas, I threw out queries, suggestions, wondering all

the time over everything, and to my astonishment the ideas took like wildfire. People made

a religion out of them" - Charles Darwin

 

"Unless transitional forms can be found in the fossil record, the theory of evolution is

worthless speculation" - Charles Darwin.

Sir Ian McKellen's penchant for ripping out pages of the Bibles he finds in hotel rooms has caught on - fans have started sending him sections of text they've removed.

He particularly likes to rip out pages that condemn homosexuality. Well, Sir Ian, saying it ain't so does not make it a reality. This is like throwing a bowling ball up in the air over your head and expecting it not to crush your head. God has the final say and you will be very shocked on the day of judgment when He may just hand them back to you with a reminder that He offered you freedom and you chose slavery to sexual perversion instead and then He will cast you into the Lake of Fire where all who have rejected His offer of freedom from sin end up. This too is a reality, not something that chanting or denying will remove.

PS: God does not SEND anyone to Hell; each person CHOOSES to go there because they refuse to live according to the word of God. Just remember this when you react to this article. Remember, you have been given free will to choose your eternal destination. Choose wisely!

The most common verse I hear quoted during an election is that God chose him or her so I have to support them. I do have to pray for them but I DO NOT have to support them. The verse that we SHOULD quote is the following.

"They have set up kings (or other officials), but NOT BY ME; they have appointed princes, but I did not know it."  Hosea 8:4

You see, it is possible for a nation to select its leaders and God had nothing to do with it. Such was the election of the Socialists now in office across the nation but especially in DC. The only kings that were selected in Israel's history that had God's approval were when the people actually ASKED Him for His choice. The people of Israel desired to be like everybody else and they rebelled against God's ruler ship over them and asked God for a king. He gave them Saul and then David. Saul blew it royally and God removed him from office. He then chose David, a man after God's heart, but even David did not live a model life before Him. God punished David for his sinful choices but stayed with him to his death. Solomon was also a chosen one from God but after him things were a mixed bag. More evil kings sat on the throne than good ones. I cannot imagine going through a forty year rule with an evil king. They ultimately destroyed Israel with sinful choices and finally God corrected them by exiling them to Babylon, present day Iraq.

David Raup, former curator of the Natural History Field Museum of Chicago, had the following to say about fossil evidence for evolution in his article, in the Field Museum Bulletin, entitled, "Conflicts Between Darwin and Paleontology. His museum contained twenty percent of all known fossil species.

"Darwin's general solution to the incompatibility of fossil evidence and his theory was to say that the fossil record is a very incomplete one that it is full of gaps, and that we have much to learn. In effect, he was saying that if the record were complete and if we had better knowledge of it we would see the finely graduated chain that he predicted. And this was his main argument for downgrading the evidence from the fossil record. Well, we are now about 120 years after Darwin and the knowledge of the fossil record has been greatly expanded. We now have a quarter of a million fossil species but the situation hasn't changed much. The record of evolution is still surprisingly jerky and, ironically, we have even fewer examples of evolutionary transition than we had in Darwin's time. By this I mean that some of the classic cases of Darwinian change in the fossil record, such as the evolution of the horse in North America, have had to be discarded or modified as a result of more detailed information - what appeared to be a nice simple progression when relatively few data were available now appears to be much more complex and much less gradualistic. So Darwin's problem has not been alleviated in the last 120 years and we still have a record which does show change but one that can hardly be looked upon as the most reasonable consequence of natural selection. (Raup D.M., "Conflicts Between Darwin and Paleontology," Field Museum of Natural History Bulletin, Field Museum of Natural History: Chicago IL, January 1979, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp.22-29, pp.24-25)

"Indeed, it is the chief frustration of the fossil record that we do not have empirical evidence for sustained trends in the evolution of most complex morphological adaptations."Stephen J. Gould and Niles Eldredge, 'Species Selection: Its Range and Power,' 1988, p. 19

"The number of intermediate varieties which have formerly existed on earth must be truly enormous. Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory." - Charles Darwin 1902 edition.

"If I, as a geologist, were called upon to explain briefly our modern ideas of the origin of the earth and the development of life on it to a simple, pastoral people, such as the tribes to whom the Book of Genesis was addressed, I could hardly do better than follow rather closely much of the language of the first chapter of Genesis." Wallace Pratt, quoted by W.L. Copithorne, in "The Worlds of Wallace Pratt," The Lamp, Fall 1971, p. 14.

Do you know what Nebraska Man turned out to be? It was reconstructed, including his whole family, from a PIG'S TOOTH. Isn't it interesting what you can do with a good artist? As a matter of fact, ALL so-called missing link finds have been artist's renderings. It is astounding that so many people around the world, if asked about Nebraska Man, would answer that it is proof of human evolution. Why is this? Because it is still being taught in many science books and especially on PBS as authentic. Talk about your intellectual integrity being shot down the tubes. Just thought you might like to know.

Eoanthropus, was the technical term for this 'discovery.' It turned out to be a deliberate and not so intelligent attempt to pull off a huge hoax on the world by celebrating the 'missing link' to human evolution. Well, it turned out to be a bit of an ape jaw and a human skull artificially aged to make it look ancient. Go figure! Would scientists actually attemtp to do such a thing? You bet they would and did.

Well, wouldn't you know it, they turned out to be just plain people, some of whom suffered from bone diseases. If you dressed them in a business suit today, they would not attract any unusual attention. Go figure!

And the rewards for abortionists don't end there. The Speaker also added a separate bill, the Indian Health legislation, into her overall reform. The move is crafty, because Speaker Pelosi has tied up the Indian Health bill in committee to keep pro-life restrictions from being included. Also missing from H.R. 3962 are protections that appeared in earlier bills to ban federal promotion of assisted suicide (Section 240) and rationing. Other sections of the bill would rewrite current tax law and redefine the family by allowing domestic partners to be the equivalent of spouses (Section 571).

If that weren't enough, Pelosi's plan seeks federal funding for sexual predators (Section 713) and also, in a reward to trial lawyers, prohibits states from using tort reform to reduce health care costs. Further expanding the nanny state, the bill also seeks to regulate vending machines (Section 2572). And while the unborn are left vulnerable, pets are not. Speaker Pelosi makes sure that veterinarians are eligible for millions in scholarships and hand outs (Sections 340m/765). There is still time to make your voice heard. Please sign our petition to keep abortion out of health care and tune into our webcast Tuesday night to learn more about the action you can take!

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=UZkvkLmkYVg